Work Text:
Nadia went to the pharmacy for Karim's cough and expected to spend less than ten minutes there. That expectation lasted until she saw the queue. The shop was narrow enough that waiting required negotiation. Two men stood near the counter pretending not to block the shelves, a mother tried to keep a sleepy little boy from leaning against a display of glass bottles, and an elderly woman in a brown coat held a folded paper so tightly that the crease had nearly split. Nadia took her place behind the mother and looked at the rows of boxes while rehearsing the list in her head: cough syrup, fever tablets in case Karim's temperature rose again, perhaps more soap if the price was reasonable. She had left him with Michael after a night of intermittent coughing that had exhausted the whole household. The morning had already acquired the dull, practical mood of minor illness. Nobody was in danger. Nobody was comfortable. Nadia wanted medicine, bread on the way home, and ideally twenty uninterrupted minutes in a chair.
The pharmacist was young enough that Nadia initially assumed the older man in the back room must be in charge, though the young man moved with the authority of someone accustomed to answering questions. He was efficient. That was the first thing she noticed. He found boxes quickly, counted change without hesitation and spoke in a clipped rhythm that kept the queue moving. He was not rude to everyone. He joked with one customer about the weather and spent several minutes explaining an ointment to the mother ahead of Nadia. The elderly woman had apparently been waiting to one side because when the mother left, she stepped forward before Nadia. Nadia did not mind. The woman unfolded her paper and placed it on the counter. The pharmacist glanced at it, reached for a small white box and began speaking before he had fully turned back. “One in the morning, one at night, after food. It says there.” He tapped the printed label with one finger. The woman nodded, but did not move. She looked at the label. Then she looked at the pharmacist. “Morning and night?” she asked. He repeated himself, slightly louder. “One in the morning, one at night. After food.” The woman nodded again and touched the paper beside the box. “This one too?” The pharmacist's shoulders changed almost imperceptibly. Nadia saw the impatience before she heard it. “That is the prescription. This is the medicine.” He pointed from paper to box as though identifying objects for a child. The woman said she understood that, but asked whether the doctor had written something else about how long she should take it. The pharmacist told her it was all written there. The woman looked down again.
Nadia might not have intervened if the exchange had ended there. Adults were entitled to impatience. Workers had bad mornings. The queue was long. But the woman asked, very softly, “Can you tell me what it says?” and the pharmacist answered, “I already told you,” with the exaggerated patience people used when they believed slowness was the same as stupidity. Something in Nadia tightened. The elderly woman's hand moved over the label without reading it. That was when Nadia understood. The woman could not read the instructions, or could not read them well enough to trust herself with medicine. She had not asked the pharmacist to repeat because she had failed to hear. She was trying to assemble a set of instructions she could remember once the box was in her own kitchen. Nadia stepped a little closer. “Excuse me,” she said to the woman rather than the pharmacist. “Do you want me to go through it with you?” The woman looked relieved and embarrassed at once, which made Nadia angry in a new direction. She said yes. Nadia asked the pharmacist whether the medicine had to be taken exactly twelve hours apart or simply morning and evening. He answered that morning and evening was fine. Nadia asked whether “after food” meant immediately after a meal. He said within about half an hour was best. She asked how many days. Seven. Whether the woman should stop if she felt better. No, complete the course unless there was a reaction or a doctor told her otherwise. Whether there were any foods to avoid. No. Whether dizziness was common. It could happen, especially at first. By the end of the questions, the pharmacist had stopped sounding impatient because Nadia's specificity forced him back into professional language.
The woman listened carefully. Nadia asked her to repeat the instructions, not as a test but so they could hear whether anything remained unclear. “One after breakfast, one after supper, for seven days,” the woman said. “Even if I feel better.” Nadia nodded. “And if it makes you very unwell, you speak to the doctor or come back.” The pharmacist added that mild stomach upset could occur and that taking it after food should help. Nadia asked whether he could mark the box in a way the woman would recognize. There was a pause. Then he drew a small sun beside the morning dose and a crescent moon beside the evening one. It was a simple solution, almost embarrassingly simple. The woman smiled at the marks. Nadia felt the anger in her chest settle without disappearing. The woman thanked her several times. Nadia disliked being thanked quite so much for what felt like basic courtesy, but she did not say this because turning kindness into a lecture would only create another burden. She helped the woman fold the prescription around the box and suggested keeping both somewhere dry. The woman said her daughter usually read things for her, but her daughter was away visiting family. She had hoped the pharmacist could explain. Nadia replied that of course he could. The words came out sharper than intended. The pharmacist heard them. He looked at Nadia, then at the woman, and said, “If you forget anything, come back.” His tone was better. Nadia could not tell whether shame, annoyance or simple recalibration had caused the change. She decided it did not matter enough to investigate.
When the elderly woman left, Nadia stepped forward with Karim's list. The pharmacist found the cough syrup. He asked the boy's age, whether there was wheezing, whether the fever had been high, and whether Karim was allergic to anything. He was, Nadia had to admit, careful. She answered his questions and watched him write the dosage on the bottle. Then she said, “Please tell me as well.” He looked up. “It is written here.” Nadia held his gaze. For one second she thought he might become defensive. Instead he exhaled through his nose and explained the dosage aloud. Nadia listened, asked one question about nighttime use, paid and left. Outside, the cold air sharpened her irritation. She walked past the bakery before realizing she had forgotten the bread and had to turn back. The inconvenience made her even angrier, which she recognized as unreasonable but allowed herself for half a block. What bothered her was not merely that the pharmacist had been impatient. Nadia had been impatient with people. She had snapped at Karim when tired, spoken too abruptly to Michael, hurried relatives through stories she had heard before. The part that lodged under her skin was the assumption beneath the tone: that needing information repeated made the woman somehow less adult. The pharmacist had been ready to explain medication to Nadia because Nadia asked questions in the language of someone he recognized as capable. The elderly woman had asked a simpler question and received a simpler kind of respect.
Nadia stopped at the bakery, bought bread, and found herself looking differently at the woman ahead of her in line, who counted coins twice before paying. She wondered how often ordinary transactions contained small humiliations that other people barely noticed. Then she became annoyed with herself for thinking in grand conclusions after one pharmacy visit. Perhaps the pharmacist had simply been having a bad morning. Perhaps the elderly woman had asked him the same question six times. Perhaps Nadia had arrived at exactly the moment patience ran out. None of those possibilities made the exchange kinder. They did, however, prevent Nadia from turning a stranger into a symbol before lunch. At home Karim was lying on the sofa under a blanket, though his condition had improved sufficiently for him to object that Michael had chosen the wrong radio station. Michael looked more tired than Karim. Nadia put the medicines on the table and announced that their patient had enough energy to complain, which she considered medically promising. Karim said he was dying. Nadia said dying people did not usually demand biscuits every twenty minutes. Michael added that this one did. Nadia measured the cough syrup while Karim watched suspiciously. Before giving it to him, she read the instructions aloud, partly because she had just spent twenty minutes thinking about instructions and partly because Karim liked knowing what adults were doing to him. He asked whether it tasted bad. Nadia said probably. He asked why medicine always tasted bad. Michael said this was how medicine proved it was serious. Nadia told him not to teach the child nonsense.
Only after Karim settled did she tell Michael about the pharmacy. He was repairing a loose hinge on a kitchen cabinet, though “repairing” seemed generous when most of his activity consisted of opening and closing the door while frowning. Nadia leaned against the table and described the elderly woman, the repeated questions, the pharmacist tapping the label. Michael listened without offering immediate judgment. When she reached the part about the sun and moon symbols, he said, “That seems sensible.” Nadia stared at him. “Yes. That is what bothers me. It was easy.” Michael closed the cabinet. It sagged slightly. He opened it again. “Easy things can still be missed.” Nadia said that this was not a philosophical observation; it was a badly designed cabinet. He told her she had understood him anyway. She paced while talking, not because the kitchen was large enough for pacing but because irritation required motion. “He spoke to her as if she were a child. Then I asked almost the same questions with longer words and suddenly they were proper questions.” Michael asked whether Nadia thought the pharmacist knew she could not read. “Eventually. Maybe from the beginning. I don't know.” She rubbed her forehead. “And maybe she could read some. That isn't even the point. She said, ‘Can you tell me what it says?’ That should have been enough.” Michael agreed. He did not offer the tempting reassurance that Nadia had fixed the problem, because he knew her well enough to understand she was not looking for praise.
Karim called from the other room to ask whether he could have honey. Nadia called back yes. Michael found the honey before she could move. The interruption softened the conversation. Nadia sat at the table and looked at the medicine bottle. Its label was perfectly clear to her. She imagined being handed something necessary to her health in a script she could not decipher, then being treated as tiresome for asking another person to bridge the gap. The thought made her angry again. “People act as if not reading means not thinking,” she said. Michael spooned honey into a small cup. “People act as if whatever they can do is the minimum everyone should be able to do.” Nadia looked at him. “That is almost intelligent.” He thanked her for the generous review. The incident should have ended there. Nadia had no organization to join, no speech to make, no sudden theory of social justice assembled before dinner. She had laundry to do, a sick child to monitor and a husband who had managed to make the cabinet hinge worse. Yet the pharmacy stayed with her. The next day, while reading a school notice Karim brought home, she wondered how many parents received similar papers and depended on children, neighbours or relatives to tell them what they said. Later that week she watched a clerk at a public office shove a form back toward a labourer and say, “Read the instructions,” without checking whether the man could. Nadia almost intervened, then saw another clerk quietly explain the form to him. She noticed the contrast because she was already looking.
She began noticing everywhere. Not illiteracy as a spectacle, but the little systems built on assumptions. Signs that gave crucial information only in small print. Medicine labels dense enough that even educated adults squinted. Officials who equated a hesitant signature with dishonesty. People who raised their voices instead of changing their words. Relatives who allowed an older person to become the family joke because she could not fill out a bank form. Nadia did not conclude that reading was unimportant. The opposite. She had always valued education and became more convinced of its power the more she saw what happened when access to it was uneven. But she also began to reject the idea that literacy itself measured intelligence, dignity or moral worth. A few weeks after the pharmacy incident, Nadia saw the elderly woman again at the market. Recognition came slowly. The woman wore a different coat and had her hair covered with a patterned scarf. Nadia might have passed without noticing if the woman had not smiled first. “The medicine worked,” she said. Nadia smiled back and asked whether she had finished all seven days. The woman lifted one eyebrow. “I did what I was told.” Nadia apologized, laughing. The woman introduced herself as Umm Samih and said her daughter had returned and scolded her for going alone. “I told her I am old, not dead.” Nadia liked her at once more than she had during their first meeting, when worry had reduced both of them to the immediate problem.
They stood beside a stall of oranges and talked for several minutes. Umm Samih had raised five children. She could calculate household costs in her head faster than Nadia could. She had worked intermittently as a seamstress and could look at a garment and estimate fabric with startling accuracy. She had learned to recognize some written words but had never become comfortable reading instructions. Her schooling had ended almost before it began. She described this without self-pity. Nadia, listening, felt embarrassed by how quickly even her sympathetic mind had reduced the woman to the fact that she could not read a medicine label. Respect could patronize too, she realized, if it became fascinated with rescuing someone. Umm Samih asked after Karim, remembered from their first meeting only as “the coughing boy,” and Nadia told her he had recovered completely and was now healthy enough to be irritating. The older woman laughed and said this was the preferred condition of children. Before they parted, she pressed two oranges into Nadia's hands despite Nadia's objections. Nadia tried to pay. Umm Samih looked offended. “Do you charge people for reading?” she asked. Nadia said no. “Then don't insult me over two oranges.” Nadia accepted them. She went home thinking less about the pharmacy than about the ease with which one characteristic could swallow a whole person if observers were not careful.
Months passed. The pharmacist remained in the same shop. Nadia continued using it because it was nearby and because, despite the incident, he was competent. Their interactions were ordinary. Once he recognized her before she reached the counter and asked after Karim. Another time he took pains to explain a dosage to an older man without being prompted. Nadia noticed that too. She resisted the satisfaction of imagining she had transformed him. People were not moral machines into which one inserted a correction and received improvement. Perhaps he had always been more patient on other days. Perhaps he remembered her questions. Perhaps the owner had spoken to him. Perhaps none of it connected. Nadia could live without knowing. One afternoon, while waiting for a bus with Karim, Nadia noticed a poster advertising evening reading classes for adults. It was written in large letters and illustrated with a pencil and an open book. The irony of advertising literacy lessons primarily through text was so obvious that she stood staring at it long enough for Karim to ask what was wrong. Nadia read the notice aloud. Karim, seven years old and newly proud of what he could decipher himself, asked why grown-ups would need reading lessons. She could have given him a speech. Instead she said that not everybody had been able to go to school when they were young, and some people had gone only briefly. Karim asked whether grown-ups felt embarrassed learning with other grown-ups. Nadia said some probably did. “Why?” he asked. She thought of Umm Samih's hand on the medicine box. “Because people are foolish about what other people don't know.” Karim considered this, then asked whether the teacher would give them homework. Nadia said almost certainly. This seemed to him a sufficient punishment for adulthood. The bus arrived, and the conversation moved on to whether he would ever be allowed to drive one. Nadia forgot the exact wording of the poster but remembered the question beneath it: what did institutions do to make learning available without making the learner first endure humiliation?
A month later, an aunt came to Nadia with a letter from a utility office. The aunt could read everyday material but found official language difficult, and her first words were an apology for bothering Nadia. That apology irritated Nadia almost as much as the letter itself. She made tea, sat beside her, and read the notice slowly. It concerned a billing correction, not a penalty, though the phrasing made it sound like an accusation. Nadia translated each sentence into ordinary speech. Her aunt listened, then laughed with relief and said she had been afraid the family owed a large sum. “They could have said this in half the words,” Nadia muttered. Her aunt replied that perhaps half the words would put somebody out of a job. They spent the next twenty minutes composing a response. Nadia did not write it alone. She asked what her aunt wanted to say and wrote down those words, then read them back. The finished letter was short. The aunt signed it and left looking lighter. Nadia remained at the table afterward, annoyed by the knowledge that literacy was not a simple line separating readers from nonreaders. A person could read perfectly well and still be excluded by vocabulary deliberately or carelessly made opaque.
She began to pay attention to how she herself used knowledge. The realization was uncomfortable. Nadia liked being competent. She liked knowing what a form meant, remembering instructions, correcting mistakes. Competence could become a little private throne if she was not careful. She remembered occasions when she had answered for relatives because it was quicker, or taken a paper from someone's hand rather than wait while they worked through it. None had seemed cruel. That was precisely the point. Cruelty was easy to condemn when it announced itself. Impatience dressed itself as efficiency and often felt reasonable to the person exercising it. Nadia did not suddenly become endlessly patient. She still hurried Karim. She still finished Michael's sentences when he took too long to explain a mechanical problem. She still snapped when tired. But now, sometimes, she caught herself. Sometimes she put the paper back into another person's hands. Sometimes she waited through the extra minute. The improvement was inconsistent enough to feel real. She also stopped assuming that a person who asked for help wanted secrecy. Some did; others joked openly about what they could not read. The respectful part was not hiding the fact for them. It was letting them decide how the fact would be handled. What changed more reliably was her own behaviour. When relatives asked her to read official letters, she stopped merely summarizing and began explaining the structure so they could recognize similar documents next time. When an aunt asked her to fill out a form, Nadia asked whether she wanted Nadia to write the answers or simply sit beside her. When a neighbour struggled with a school notice, Nadia did not turn the moment into a lesson unless invited. She learned to ask, “What would help?” rather than assume that help meant taking over. This was not always elegant. She sometimes overexplained and was told to stop. She sometimes offered assistance where none was needed. She learned to be corrected without making the correction about her intentions.
One practical habit stayed with her almost immediately. Whenever Nadia collected medicine for anyone in the household, she wrote the dosing times in her own plain language on a separate scrap and kept it with the bottle. At first Michael teased her for creating a second label for a perfectly good first label, until he came home exhausted one night and had to ask whether Karim's tablets had already been given. Nadia showed him the scrap with the time marked beside the dose. The usefulness ended the joke. She began doing the same for an older neighbour after an illness, drawing a small sun or moon when that was easier than writing a time. None of this felt like activism. It felt like household competence, the kind of thing women passed between one another without naming it. Yet Nadia liked that the method assumed confusion could be solved by clearer information rather than by blaming the person who was confused.
The memory returned years later in larger conversations, though Nadia never treated the pharmacy as an origin story. When she spoke about access to education, adult literacy, public information or the way institutions embarrassed people for what they had not been taught, the image sometimes came back: an elderly hand resting on a white medicine box, a young pharmacist tapping printed words, a tiny sun and moon drawn afterward in pen. The scene had not awakened her politically in a flash. Nadia distrusted such neat stories. She had been forming opinions all her life, often inconsistently, through family, faith, work, motherhood, anger, affection and simple observation. The pharmacy was one more stone placed among many. That evening in 1981, though, none of the future mattered. Karim woke after midnight coughing again. Nadia sat beside him with water, rubbed his back and waited for the fit to pass. When he was settled, she returned to bed and found Michael half awake. He asked whether the medicine was helping. Nadia said she thought so. In the dark, after a minute, she added, “I am still angry about that woman.” Michael murmured that he knew. “It was such a small thing,” Nadia said. “That is why.” He did not ask her to explain further. Nadia lay awake listening to Karim breathe in the next room and thought about how many small things accumulated because each was too ordinary to deserve outrage on its own.
By morning, the anger had cooled into something less dramatic and more durable. She made breakfast. She read the medicine label again. She marked the time of Karim's last dose on a scrap of paper. Michael finally fixed the cabinet hinge. The world did not rearrange itself around what Nadia had noticed. She simply carried the notice with her. It joined other observations, other irritations, other moments when a person had been made smaller for someone else's convenience. Years later, people would sometimes ask when Nadia had become interested in one cause or another, as though convictions ought to have birthdays. She rarely knew how to answer. There had been no bell. There had been a queue, a tired worker, an old woman, a box of medicine, and the understanding that dignity was often decided in transactions too brief for anyone to remember except the person who had been denied it.