Upcoming limit on tags per work

Post Header

Published:

2021-08-24 21:12:26 UTC

Translations:

Tags:

In the coming days, we'll be rolling out a code change that limits the total number of fandom, character, relationship, and additional tags that can be added to a work. This limit of 75 tags will apply to both new and existing works, but no tags will be automatically removed from existing works.

Why place a limit on tags?

Having a limit on tags will:

help keep work blurbs to a reasonable length, improving the experience of navigating work listings, and
encourage creators to tag for the most important elements of their works, improving the quality of search results.

Why 75 tags?

We looked at all the works on the Archive and determined that:

the average number of tags per work is 17,
the most common number of tags per work is 11, and
less than 0.5% of works have more than 75 tags.

A limit of 75 total fandom, character, relationship, and additional tags per work will provide the vast majority of creators with enough space to describe the content of their works while also keeping work blurbs to a manageable size.

Why don't ratings, categories, and warnings count toward the limit?

Ratings, categories, and warnings already have limits of their own. A work can only have one rating, and the number of categories and warnings a work can have is limited by the number of options provided on the posting form.

What should I do if I notice someone's work has more than 75 total fandom, character, relationship, and additional tags?

Nothing! Works that exceed the tag limit do not violate the Terms of Service and should not be reported to the Policy & Abuse team or the Support team.

What happens to previously posted works with more than 75 total fandom, character, relationship, and additional tags?

Nothing! The work will keep all of its tags.

However, if the work creator wants to edit the work or add a chapter, they will have to remove some of their fandom, character, relationship, and/or additional tags before they can save their changes. (An error message will tell the creator exactly how many tags must be removed.)

Actions

Comments

Sorry, this news post doesn't allow comments.

Pages Navigation

AnneAizawa Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:05AM UTC

As an author of a sexually explicit work which currently is sitting at just under 30,000 words, but is intended to run closer to 150,000 I must say that I STRONGLY disagree with this limit. I've ALREADY hit this limit and VERY FEW of my tags could be considered extraneous or redundant. Even if I were to go in and prune a few of them out, by the time I finish this fic it will contain MANY more things that should be tagged in order not to trigger people and there is NO possibility of keeping it under 75 and being adequately tagged. Could I move some of those things to the author's notes? Yes, but that doesn't help people to filter for them to either search for or exclude those kinks/squicks. Could I split it into a series? Possibly but not for quite some time since there is absolutely a difference between where you break a story and where you break chapter.
Authors of long fic and authors of erotic fic are 100% going to be hurt by this and make the site less functional as a result.
If the wall of tags bothers you, there's a site skin add-on that makes any list of tags longer than 5 lines go into a scroll box and guess what - it works on mobile too! Start with making that a site-wide default and then maybe people will stop being frustrated by this and such a drastic and harmful change won't necessary.

Comment Actions
- Thread
1. Elf (Elf_Herself) Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:23AM UTC
  
  The scrollbox solution doesn't work for people using screen readers - it still has to read all the tags. And it works on some browsers; others may have problems with it. Doesn't worked when you're not logged in on a new computer.
  I won't say "any story, no matter how complex, will fit in 75 tags or less," even if I've never seen one that I thought needed half that many. However, there are tips and tricks writers can use to cut down the tag count without losing information. If a relationship is tagged, you don't need to tag the individual characters - they'll already be included in searches. Learning how the metatags work can help - if you tag for "canon-typical violence," you don't need to tag for "violence" because that's already included, and so on.
  I read longfic erotica, and I am very much looking forward to a change that means works may be tagged with the focus characters & pairings and not every relationship that exists somewhere in the fic. Ditto for kinks and other erotic content - I'd like the tags to include major ones, and "this also shows up" can be in author's notes; people with those triggers can backbutton when they see them.
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
2. 1. AnneAizawa Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:59AM UTC
    
    So make the tag limit proportional to the length of the story and not a blanket limit across the site. Perhaps you only care about what the main pairing is, but I'm not going to just not tag the sexual encounters between other characters that are written out in detail. The other nonsexual relationships are not just in the background, but are hugely significant to the story as a whole. Nice to know that the relationship tags mean that I don't have to tag the individual characters (that should really be more prominent information on this site for people to know). However that doesn't change the fact that kinks/squicks NEED to be tagged for whether your personal preference is to see them or not. (You can absolutely alter your preferences to just not show them if they bother you that much.)
    Another option would be for the site to just write a code for an additional preference to say rather than "hide additional tags" to say "hide additional tags after [number]".
    If you only want limited relationships to be tagged then by all means go back to the mess that was FF.net. For the rest of us being able to know what's going to be in a fic before we click it is the beauty of this site.
    That said I notice that you seem to have appointed yourself the personal police of this thread. I just came here to make my displeasure known. 75 is too low of a number. If there has to be a limit then 100-150 would be a better number, but I oppose the idea that there should be a limit at all. That said we're obviously not going to agree on this, but quite frankly, your being the loudest voice doesn't actually make you the most important. I won't be responding to further interaction from you.
    
    Last Edited Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:00AM UTC
    
    Comment Actions
    - Thread
    - Parent Thread
  2. 1. Alyndra Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:20AM UTC
      
      I don't think it's true that relationship tags make character tags unnecessary. Fics won't appear in the tag for character X if it's tagged with X/Y but not X.
      
      Comment Actions
      - Thread
      - Parent Thread
    2. 1. GreenQuilll Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:32AM UTC
        
        I just tried it and it worked. I still found the fic when I searched for X.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
      2. simonlorden Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:40AM UTC
        
        Try it again in half an hour or an hour. It takes a bit of time for the archive to catch up.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
        
        GreenQuilll Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:49AM UTC
        
        Tried it again (not with my own fic). You were right. I wondered at first because relationships and characters are two different things, but I wanted to try it out for myself.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
      3. AnneAizawa Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:38AM UTC
        
        Well that just makes things all every bit as bad as I thought they were. Obviously whatever "genius" came up with this idea don't really understand what's like to write long fic in large ensemble cast fandoms.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
    3. checkerspot Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:31AM UTC
      
      Kinks/triggers don't need to be tagged, actually. The only things that *need* to be tagged on Ao3 are rape/noncon, graphic violence, underage sex, and major character death, or you can choose not to warn. Tagging for kinks and triggers is up to the preference of the individual author.
      
      Comment Actions
      - Thread
      - Parent Thread
    4. 1. AnneAizawa Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:35AM UTC
        
        Perhaps we have a different view of "need", but being able to filter for specific kinks/squicks is what makes this site functional. If we're not tagging those things then we might as well go back to the DISASTER that is FF.net.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
      2. Lady_Douji Wed 25 Aug 2021 02:15PM UTC
        
        Even if you feel that kinks need to be tagged for, there's not really a need to use multiple tags that mean the same thing. Like there's no need to tag Alternate Universe - Slavery (indicating the fic is taking place in an AU with slavery) as well as Slavery. Especially as Slavery is a meta tag for Alternate Universe - Slavery
        https://archiveofourown.org/admin_posts/37 So if you tag AU-Slavery it's still going to show up in the meta Slavery tag.
        Walls of tags containing duplicate and sometimes useless information renders the site unusable for some and an annoyance for others.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
        
        AnneAizawa Wed 25 Aug 2021 02:58PM UTC
        
        I love that you found it necessary to pick out one of the VERY FEW tags that might be redundant on my work (which I acknowledged in my first post that I might be able to prune a couple). This does not negate my position. Even if I remove the 'slavery' tag, which at the time of posting that tag I didn't realize WAS redundant and I haven't taken the time to update, doesn't change the fact that a fic with a large number of kinks/squicks/triggers to be tagged for WILL be hurt by this.
        I'm well aware that "walls of tags" are annoying to scroll by and get annoyed by them to an extent myself (which is why I have a site skin on to compress them into a space I can choose to scroll through or not), but there is very often nuance in even those, and there are ways to avoid seeing them if you don't want to. Implementing more user friendly ways of blocking tags/works/users you don't want to see and offering more ways of limiting tags viewed without cutting them completely, etc (WITHOUT having to write your own site code which very few people know how to do and WITHOUT having to save filtered searches on your device rather than your account) to make the site more practical for the people who get annoyed by this without damaging the ability to tag with nuance for those who appreciate it. Just because a large number of tags annoys you doesn't mean that others don't find them highly useful.
        Heck even a pop-up information window showing nested/connected tags without having to click away from the posting window would be a better step than limiting tags because then authors would already know without having to go digging through the meta tags pages (cause you wanna talk 'wall of tags' THAT'S one of them - it's enough to make you go crosseyed) would probably solve the issue that bothers you without any limit needed.
        The more general tags don't often cut it for people who are looking for/avoiding more specific things and knowing which more general tags can be left out in favor of the more nuanced ones and still have the work show up is far from clear especially when dealing with tags that have not yet be canonized by the wranglers.
        Education before limits is much better method to take. Jumping straight to the drastic solution doesn't make anything better for anyone.
        
        Last Edited Wed 25 Aug 2021 03:02PM UTC
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
        
        Lady_Douji Wed 25 Aug 2021 03:37PM UTC
        
        The fact that you didn't realize that AU-Slavery and Slavery were redundant until it was pointed out says a lot more about you than you think. It says you didn't bother to educate yourself on how tags work, what redundancy means, and perhaps not even how words work.
        And don't get me started on your hypocrisy of saying you get annoyed by large walls of tags while insisting you absolutely have to included a large wall of tags on your own fics. Walls of redundant and uninformative tags is far more than an annoyance for some users. It's an accessibility issue for those who use screen readers as it can make their screen readers crash. (and as far as I know, skins and options to collapse tags don't work with screen readers) In short not everyone has the option to block, collapse or avoid the dreaded WALL OF TAGS. All because a small number of people can't be bothered to educate themselves better ways to tag, and are too lazy to take advantage of the summaries, and authors notes, both of which can be used to provide more nuanced details on any tags included on the fic.
        So at this points limits are needed because it seems obvious that without them people won't bother to learn better methods of tagging.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
        
        (6 more comments in this thread)
        
        DebraHicks Fri 27 Aug 2021 09:30PM UTC
        
        I don't use a lot of tag searches, mostly because I get monster sized, cross overs where what I am looking for appears one time one screen 200. And if I am looking for a good m/m smut piece, I don't need to know every single position they are going to take. As far as triggers, yes, do the main ones or go with "Chooses Not to Use Warnings". I might use one or two tags to search but I read based on summary.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
      3. tillwehavefaces Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:38AM UTC
        
        But some people are specifically looking for those things, and others are looking to avoid them. You don't have to, but it's hugely helpful to making sure your fic lands in front of the tight audience.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
      4. checkerspot Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:52AM UTC
        
        Sure? I'm just saying it's not required. The person I was responding to said that not seeing tags was a preference, but tagging kinks/triggers was a need. I'm just pointing out that that is *also* a preference. An understandable one, and one I know many people appreciate! But it's not a requirement on the site.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
        
        (6 more comments in this thread)
3. tillwehavefaces Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:35AM UTC
  
  "Authors of long fic and authors of erotic fic are 100% going to be hurt by this and make the site less functional as a result."
  This.
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
idanit Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:11AM UTC

I didn't need this change, but I know many people wanted it. I'd still make separate limits for character, relationship, and additional tags. 75 isn't too low and I know I personally won't need more, but I think it unnecessarily punishes people who write long stories with multiple POVs and lead characters, and restricts the number of additional tags they could use compared to a story with only one main character/one main pairing.

Comment Actions
- Thread
1. Meddalarksen Fri 27 Aug 2021 12:17AM UTC
  
  This!
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
2. Tayefeth Fri 27 Aug 2021 07:19PM UTC
  
  Or 25 each for fandom, character, and relationship and 75 for additional. And if people could remember the ensemble tags for when various characters show up for a single line or are just mentioned, that'd be great...
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
fjalamoth Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:12AM UTC

Good. The limit could be even lower though, 75 tags is still a bit excessive.

Last Edited Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:15AM UTC

Comment Actions
- Thread
1. DebraHicks Fri 27 Aug 2021 09:31PM UTC
  
  Absolutely.
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
BriarLily Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:25AM UTC

THANK YOU

Comment Actions
- Thread
tillwehavefaces Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:36AM UTC

I checked to see if I had more than 75 tags on any of my fics. Turns out I do. Damn.

Comment Actions
- Thread
1. Elf (Elf_Herself) Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:46AM UTC
  
  They won't need to be changed unless you edit or update them. Existing complete works don't need to have their tags reduced; it's just that WIPs and new works will need to fit in the new limit.
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
2. 1. tillwehavefaces Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:52AM UTC
    
    Yeah, I do plan to update that one, so I will have to chop a few out. It's okay tho, I am guilty of using the Tumblr-style chatty tags to show off my glittering wit, cause I guess I'm in the minority that actually likes those. I feel like this is a change that disproportionately impacts purveyors of filth lol. I'm guessing that 0.5% consists primarily of porn. When you're writing smut with heaps of hyper-specific kinks and triggers you absolutely need to tag all of them because there's some people who will click on your fic for one of them alone, and other people who won't click on it for the same reason, and will be outraged if they encounter it unexpectedly.
    
    Comment Actions
    - Thread
    - Parent Thread
  2. 1. Elf (Elf_Herself) Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:57AM UTC
      
      I mostly like the tumblr-style chatty tags. I definitely like them more than tagging every single character who makes an appearance in the fic.
      Even for smut... there are two-million-word smutfics that have 20 tags. Because at some point, you just tag "THARE BE DYCKS HERE" and let people sort out the details for themselves.
      
      Comment Actions
      - Thread
      - Parent Thread
    2. 1. Gement Wed 25 Aug 2021 03:53PM UTC
        
        Mm. I'm in favor of the 75 tag limit, for the record, but I don't filter for "thar be dicks here," I filter for specific kinks. This will be impacted. I consider it a necessary tradeoff, but it will be impacted.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
      2. Elf (Elf_Herself) Thu 26 Aug 2021 12:24AM UTC
        
        Fair enough, yeah. There's still space for authors to add details in the summary, author's notes, or chapter notes, but it will change how to find works - an extra clickthrough before seeing something you want to avoid, and that kind of thing.
        I do get that this will change the way some people use the archive, and that's at least a nuisance, and sometimes more than that. I'm just not seeing it as comparable to strikethrough or ff.net's purges, which has been implied in a couple of places.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
      3. curious_cat Thu 26 Aug 2021 12:55AM UTC
        
        that's not actually correct - kinks are often really specific and should be tagged as such if the fic is going to reach the right audience. Maybe longer smutfics will start to lose chatty tags as a style adaptation. I haven't read that much explicit fic that was over this tag limit, but the ones that were probably needed to be, honestly, especially if there are a lot of characters.
        
        Comment Actions
        
        Thread
        
        Parent Thread
    3. Beatrice_Otter Thu 26 Aug 2021 10:50AM UTC
      
      I don't think "likes chatty tags" is a minority. From what I can tell, there are a handful of people who HATE chatty tags with a passion, a handful who LOVE them just as much, and most people are in the middle with either "I like them as long as there are only a few of them and it doesn't turn into a Wall O' Tags" or "they're okay as long as it doesn't turn into a Wall O' Tags." It's just that the people who hate them are so vocal, and the people who like or are indifferent to them dislike lots of them on one fic, so it seems like people like them less than they do.
      
      Comment Actions
      - Thread
      - Parent Thread
KeroZombie Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:52AM UTC

In principle I agree that a lot of fics seem to have too many tags, but at the same time I think this hurts fandoms with large casts and lots of media variations (movies, comics etc.) disproportionately, and may mean many works go with key triggers untagged. EDIT: for some people, even seeing the tag can be triggering enough, so being able to filter it away completely is important. Authors notes are not a perfect replacement.
And before anyone checks, no, I don't have any fics with over 75 tags, but I'm in a fandom with a truly ridiculous cast size so I can see problems coming up further down the line.

Last Edited Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:17AM UTC

Comment Actions
- Thread
1. poalimal Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:53AM UTC
  
  Totally agree. Grateful the comments section helped me understand the full impact of this tag limit.
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
2. curious_cat Thu 26 Aug 2021 12:58AM UTC
  
  we can hope that maybe a secondary effect of this will be some cleanup in how movie and comic fandom tags are organized.
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
checkerspot Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:22AM UTC

Thank you for this- I think 75 is an extremely generous limit. No solution is ever going to make everyone happy, but I think this is a good compromise that still allows a lot of author freedom while addressing the issue of site usability.

Comment Actions
- Thread
(Previous comment deleted.)
1. victoriousscarf Wed 25 Aug 2021 03:31PM UTC
  
  👍
  Really wish it was a 100 myself
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
Tunicate Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:33AM UTC

Thank you for this change!
The more tags a fic has, the less weight I give to each tag. To give an extreme example, if a fic is tagged with, say, the fandom, the characters, and only "Car Crash" in the additional tags section, I would readily believe that the fic is centered around a car crash. On the other hand, if a 10k or even a 100k fic has 100 additional tags that happen to include "Car Crash", I won't know if the car crash is incidental in a chase scene, or if the car crash is mentioned in the in-fic news, or if I actually need to avoid that fic because a character gets injured from the car crash.

Comment Actions
- Thread
Strange and Intoxicating -rsa- (strangeandintoxicating) Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:43AM UTC

Bless you.

Comment Actions
- Thread
Isagawa Wed 25 Aug 2021 09:05AM UTC

Wonderful news! I appreciate the explaning effort with the numbers (and like that you told both the average *and* the most common number of tag, v helpful). Thanks!

Comment Actions
- Thread
Fenrevas Wed 25 Aug 2021 09:09AM UTC

I worry that the 75 limit would disproportionately affect some fandoms over others (for instance those with a lot of characters and media types and where long fics are prevalent and popular). And will disproportionately affect long fics that cover nuanced and complex themes.
I know some fic writers who tag well for content warning and relationships within their long fics, have over 75 tags due to these reasons.
I feel that increasing the limit to 100 or 150 would be more reasonable if it is inclusive of fandom, character and relationship tags and would still prevent issues where people are tagging pages of tags. Some in depth fics will have 20 or so (or more) tags just in relationships and characters, let alone main genre, tropes and content warnings.
I appreciate content warnings and genre tags a lot and this is the main reason I am drawn to fan fic and A03 over other kinds of media. I read tags before I decide whether to read a fic. I appreciate more specific content warnings by chapter or in the summary where relevant but hugely appreciate tags. Including some conversational tags such as 'Hawke is not left in the Fade' or if a fic is tagged for abuse, if it then says 'abuse does not occur within the main pairing' as a couple of examples.
I am concerned that for longer and more involved fics, the limit could mean that writers take out content warnings from tags in order to ensure the relationships, fandoms and tropes included in their fics can fit in the tags, because reasonably they want their fic to be searchable.
I understand this only affects a relatively small number of fics, but some of those fics will be the long and in-depth stories often tackling nuanced and sensitive issues and topics which do need a lot of tags. And some of these have around 75 tags already (or more) as work in progress stories because the author's are ensuring content warnings, relationships and main tropes people may search for are tagged effectively. I therefore think making the limit 100 or 150 would be more fair to these kinds of fics whilst also ensuring a limit to reduce walls of unnecessary tags. Thank you.

Comment Actions
- Thread
Melliemello Wed 25 Aug 2021 09:10AM UTC

Great news! Thanks :)

Comment Actions
- Thread
1. simonlorden Wed 25 Aug 2021 09:42AM UTC
  
  Your icon is so cute!!
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
Gammarad Wed 25 Aug 2021 09:24AM UTC

This is great and I hope it benefits the site! Thanks for coming up with a good plan and solution.
I hope this change will enable progress for the site's tag system 💙

Comment Actions
- Thread
Bellweather Wed 25 Aug 2021 10:11AM UTC

Good call! In my opinion. Thanks for these updates :)

Comment Actions
- Thread
TapDancingKittens Wed 25 Aug 2021 10:19AM UTC

About time, thank you! I'm getting tired of wading through fics with hundreds of tags. Hopefully, this will help people learn to tag only major characters and events, not events/characters that only appear for a few lines throughout the entire story.

Comment Actions
- Thread
Account Deleted Wed 25 Aug 2021 10:23AM UTC

Yes.

Comment Actions
- Thread
knittingway Wed 25 Aug 2021 10:27AM UTC

I personally don't think enforcing a limit on something that, as stated, only affects 0.5% of the works currently on the site is going to improve search results a noticeable amount. Especially for works that are not going to recieve updates that would require the author to prune it down.
And fandom is a required field; the other categories are not. I think fandoms should be excluded from the limit for that reason alone.

Last Edited Wed 25 Aug 2021 10:30AM UTC

Comment Actions
- Thread
1. knittingway Wed 25 Aug 2021 05:07PM UTC
  
  Adding to this that fics do have a limit of character and relationship tags, even for crossovers, even for works with OCs. Admittedly, if one were to tag every possible relationship a work could have with the whole cast, it would be a very big number. Additional tags however? Potentially infinite. That, I can understand the need for a limit.
  Perhaps there could be better tutorials/documentation on tagging available? "otp: true" is one of this site's best kept secrets, for example. Also, the suggestion that using the X&Y tag includes the work under the searches for both X and Y separately. Despite it being mentioned in this comment section, I am still unsure if it works. I'd like to test it myself, but nearly every fic I've read tags both "X&Y" and the characters separately. This is not information that is very visible to a user posting works.
  As many have noted, this will disproportionately affect longfic writers, erotica writers, longfic erotica writers, smaller fandoms with less canonical tags, and fandoms with large casts. As a longfic fan, I'd hate to miss out on something I'd enjoy because the author had to limit themselves in the blurb.
  Tags are just as much for advertising as they are granular warnings. This is hamstringing the exclude function, which many use to curate their AO3 experience and keep themselves happy and safe. Tagging a fic throughly and responsibly helps protect readers and authors alike. While triggers are an obvious choice, sometimes even a background mention of a character or ship (or the dynamics of a ship even) can be enough to sour a reader's experience, and potentially open an author up to harassment.
  I feel like this decision, while based on good data, was made with the simplest/easiest to implement choice in mind, not what would be most in line with the Archive's vision. I sincerely hope that all this feedback is being considered before this change is implemented.
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
2. 1. a_gay_poster Sat 28 Aug 2021 09:01PM UTC
    
    A bit late but since you mentioned being unsure, it is *not* the case that works tagged Character A/Character B or Character A&Character B in the "Relationships" field show up when you search for "Character A" or "Character B" in the "Characters" field. The two categories are unconnected. However, if you do a general-terms search for the character name, works tagged with the ship will also show up.
    
    Comment Actions
    - Thread
    - Parent Thread
3. DragonSoulDreams Sun 29 Aug 2021 09:35AM UTC
  
  No, fandoms should not be excluded from the limit, because there are people who tag 170+ fandoms on a "work". No, that's not a typo, I've repeatedly run into a dribble bin that does that, and it clogs things up across all those fandoms every time it updates. I'm looking forward to the damned thing getting permanently kicked off the first page of most of those fandoms. Even if they decide to lose all the non-fandom tags, they'd still have to shed the supermajority of the fandom tags. Or they could just never update it again, which would also keep it of the first page.
  
  Last Edited Sun 29 Aug 2021 09:42AM UTC
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
WriteInTheHeart Wed 25 Aug 2021 10:53AM UTC

i've been reading all the comments, and i'm seeing a lot of people say that this will adversely affect longfic, esp in fandoms with large ensemble casts. and while i have my doubts it'll be as bad as they're all saying after they've really thought through all the tags that NEED to be there, i can definitely see how a longer work could more easily run into the 75 mark. i checked my own 400k+ fic, and i was surprised to be at about 36, with a few clarifying tags in the author's notes. thankfully it's for a small fandom with a smaller cast using a more niche format.
im wondering if maybe the fandom/character/relationship/and additional tags should all have their own limits instead, rather than collectively contributing to the 75 limit. fandom seems to need the least, so maybe a limit of 10-15 (just to cover some of the more absurd crossovers and so that fandoms with differently canonical media can tag what they need), maybe 25-50 for character, 15-20 for relationship, and 50 for additional? i feel like that's still very generous as it mins at 100 and maxes at 135. it would still cut down on the one-shot/drabble compilations that should really be a linked series or collection, still be largely unused since the majority of fics get nowhere near 75 already, and still give longfic/ensemble fandoms more room.
that, or maybe it's time to implement a "read more" system. i think tag limiting is easier to implement quickly, but a read more (for both tags and summaries bc some of those get wall-ish as well) could be fantastic

Comment Actions
- Thread
1. lapsedpacifist Wed 25 Aug 2021 12:57PM UTC
  
  Hey, there's already something like a 'read more' option for both Additional Tags as well as all Warnings -- you can set it up in preferences by choosing the 'Hide additional tags (you can still choose to show them)' box or the 'Hide warnings (you can still choose to show them)'. But those hide all the tags, not just over a specific amount, which is definitely a great idea, and for the summaries too!
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
2. Beatrice_Otter Thu 26 Aug 2021 10:56AM UTC
  
  A read-more will not help people with a screenreader, alas.
  
  Comment Actions
  - Thread
  - Parent Thread
3. 1. WriteInTheHeart Fri 27 Aug 2021 08:58PM UTC
    
    ah... the cursed intersection of accessibility and interface design...
    
    Comment Actions
    - Thread
    - Parent Thread
Account Deleted Wed 25 Aug 2021 11:11AM UTC

Ohh nice! Thank you for explaining and for your hard work ❤

Comment Actions
- Thread

AO3 News

Post Header

Actions

Comments

Pages Navigation

AnneAizawa Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:05AM UTC

Comment Actions

Elf (Elf_Herself) Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:23AM UTC

Comment Actions

AnneAizawa Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:59AM UTC

Comment Actions

Alyndra Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:20AM UTC

Comment Actions

GreenQuilll Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:32AM UTC

Comment Actions

simonlorden Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:40AM UTC

Comment Actions

GreenQuilll Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:49AM UTC

Comment Actions

AnneAizawa Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:38AM UTC

Comment Actions

checkerspot Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:31AM UTC

Comment Actions

AnneAizawa Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:35AM UTC

Comment Actions

Lady_Douji Wed 25 Aug 2021 02:15PM UTC

Comment Actions

AnneAizawa Wed 25 Aug 2021 02:58PM UTC

Comment Actions

Lady_Douji Wed 25 Aug 2021 03:37PM UTC

Comment Actions

DebraHicks Fri 27 Aug 2021 09:30PM UTC

Comment Actions

tillwehavefaces Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:38AM UTC

Comment Actions

checkerspot Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:52AM UTC

Comment Actions

tillwehavefaces Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:35AM UTC

Comment Actions

idanit Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:11AM UTC

Comment Actions

Meddalarksen Fri 27 Aug 2021 12:17AM UTC

Comment Actions

Tayefeth Fri 27 Aug 2021 07:19PM UTC

Comment Actions

fjalamoth Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:12AM UTC

Comment Actions

DebraHicks Fri 27 Aug 2021 09:31PM UTC

Comment Actions

BriarLily Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:25AM UTC

Comment Actions

tillwehavefaces Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:36AM UTC

Comment Actions

Elf (Elf_Herself) Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:46AM UTC

Comment Actions

tillwehavefaces Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:52AM UTC

Comment Actions

Elf (Elf_Herself) Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:57AM UTC

Comment Actions

Gement Wed 25 Aug 2021 03:53PM UTC

Comment Actions

Elf (Elf_Herself) Thu 26 Aug 2021 12:24AM UTC

Comment Actions

curious_cat Thu 26 Aug 2021 12:55AM UTC

Comment Actions

Beatrice_Otter Thu 26 Aug 2021 10:50AM UTC

Comment Actions

KeroZombie Wed 25 Aug 2021 07:52AM UTC

Comment Actions

poalimal Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:53AM UTC

Comment Actions

curious_cat Thu 26 Aug 2021 12:58AM UTC

Comment Actions

checkerspot Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:22AM UTC

Comment Actions

victoriousscarf Wed 25 Aug 2021 03:31PM UTC

Comment Actions

Tunicate Wed 25 Aug 2021 08:33AM UTC

Comment Actions