Work Text:
They’d packed themselves wall to wall into the student union atrium—sleeping bags, hand-painted banners, coffee cups, photocopied flyers still warm from the machine. A “NO BLOOD FOR OIL” sheet hung crooked over the balcony. Someone had rigged an old PA system, and when Cornel West stepped up to the mic, the crowd shifted—a little murmur, the rustle of notebooks, the click of tape recorders snapping on.
He smiled, bowed his head briefly, then looked out at them.
“My dear brothers and sisters, precious students, beloved faculty, freedom-loving folk…”
First, let me just say this: I am deeply moved to see you here, shoulder to shoulder, refusing to be anesthetized by the narcotic of business-as-usual while the bombs fall abroad and the lies fall at home.
We are here in a sit-in, but make no mistake—we are also standing up. Standing up in the midst of a culture that too often sits down in the face of injustice, lies flat in the face of suffering, and changes the channel when the empire drops its bombs.
(Murmurs of approval. Someone snaps their fingers.)
Now, the pundits on television will say, “This is about Saddam. This is about aggression. This is about defending freedom and democracy.” They offer you a script, my young brothers and sisters, and they want you to speak your lines on cue. They want you to clap when they say clap, cry when they say cry, and wave the flag exactly when they tell you to.
But you are here tonight because you refuse to live by somebody else’s script.
You’re here because you recognize that what is taking place under the name of “Operation Desert Storm” is not some video game, not some abstract geopolitical chess match—it is a storm of steel and fire falling on fragile human bodies, on children with names, on grandmamas with stories, on brothers and sisters who love, who fear, who hope just like you.
“Let us tell the truth,” because without truth there is no justice, and without justice, there can be no genuine peace.
They say this war is about “liberating Kuwait.” But how selective our concern for liberation becomes when the oil wells are nearby, when the corporate profits are on the line, when the map lines up just so with the pipelines and the contracts. How many occupied peoples, how many oppressed laborers, how many crushed democracies cry out with no rescue on the way, because they are poor, because they are black or brown, because they have no oil under their feet?
So we must ask: Is this war truly about justice—or about interests?
Is it about human rights—or about cheap oil and imperial credibility?
Is it about the sanctity of borders—or about sending a message to the world that the American empire will brook no disobedience, especially when it comes to the flow of resources that keep the malls bright and the gas tanks full?
Some will say, “Professor West, you’re being cynical. Our leaders tell us they pray. They tell us they are sober, serious men. They say this war is unfortunate but necessary.”
Let us be clear: I do not doubt that there are sincere people in high office. But sincerity is no guarantee of justice. You can be sincerely wrong. You can be sincerely trapped in a system that rewards you for turning human beings into abstractions, for turning flesh into statistics, for turning the blood of Iraqi and American youth into a bargaining chip on the global stage.
You see, we are dealing not simply with individuals but with structures—structures of militarism, of greed, of racism, of empire. And the Gulf War is the latest manifestation of these structures flexing their muscles.
Now, I want you to feel the weight of this: When the bombs drop over Baghdad, they do not ask for ID. They do not separate the guilty from the innocent. They fall on whoever happens to be under them. And those are overwhelmingly poor and working-class folk. Many of them are brown, many of them Muslim, many of them who have never even heard of the policymakers who signed off on their fate.
And here at home? Who is overrepresented on the front lines of every American war? Poor folk. Working-class folk. Disproportionately black and brown folk. Young people whose guidance counselors pointed them not toward college but toward the recruiter’s office. Young men and women whose dreams have already been downsized by an economy that treats them as disposable.
So when we say we oppose this war, we are not anti-soldier. No, no—don’t let anybody twist that. We are pro-truth, pro-justice, pro-life in the deepest, most radical sense. We love our brothers and sisters in uniform enough to say: your blood should not be spilled for a lie, for a contract, for an image of power.
(Applause, shouts of “That’s right!”)
This sit-in you’ve organized—this is more than a protest. It is a moral interruption.
In a society obsessed with speed, obsessed with efficiency, obsessed with the latest gadget, you are saying: Stop. Slow down. Think. Feel. You are creating a space where we can ask the questions that the politicians, the pundits, and yes, even some college administrators would prefer you not ask.
Questions like:
Whose children are being put in harm’s way?
Whose neighborhoods are policed like occupied zones while we preach “liberation” abroad?
Whose stories are never heard when CNN rolls its footage of “surgical strikes” and “smart bombs”?
Let’s talk about that language—“surgical strikes.” You’d think we were removing a tumor with delicate precision, not shattering a city with explosives. Euphemism is the deodorant of empire: it tries to mask the stench of death with pretty words.
But you all, sitting here in sleeping bags on a cold floor, are saying: We refuse the deodorant. We will smell the truth. We will not pretend that war is clean, that death is antiseptic, that devastation is something you can package with a theme song and a logo.
And of course, when you ask those questions, they will call you naïve.
They’ll say, “You young people don’t understand realism. The world is a dangerous place. Sometimes you have to bomb for peace. Sometimes you have to kill for stability.”
But I want to suggest to you that there is a very peculiar definition of realism at work here.
Because what could be more unrealistic than believing you can sow violence and reap peace?
What could be more naïve than thinking you can drop tons of explosives on a region already saturated with wounds and expect it to blossom into democracy and harmony?
You see, moral courage is the highest form of realism. It looks at the world as it is—broken, bloody, confused—and still insists: we can do better than this. We must do better than this.
Remember, we come out of a tradition—especially those of us shaped by the Black Freedom Struggle, by the prophetic witness of Martin Luther King Jr., Fannie Lou Hamer, Malcolm X, Ella Baker—that knows something about empire, something about militarism, something about being on the underside of somebody else’s dream.
Dr. King warned us of the triple evils: racism, materialism, militarism. He said that a nation that spends more on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.
Well, my brothers and sisters, look around. Look at the budgets. Look at the bombs. Look at the boarded-up schools and the overcrowded shelters. We are living in precisely the reality he warned of. And this war in the Gulf is one more symptom of that spiritual sickness.
Let’s talk about race, because we cannot be honest about America, we cannot be honest about this war, without confronting race.
Some of the same politicians who were silent when our inner cities were starved of resources, when black and brown babies were condemned to substandard schools, when police brutality went unchecked—some of these same politicians have suddenly discovered their humanitarian conscience when it comes to Kuwait.
Now I welcome any awakening of conscience, but I must ask: Why is it that Arab lives become precious when they sit atop oil reserves useful to Western powers, but not when Palestinian children are under occupation, or when Lebanese civilians are under bombardment? Why is it that we can mobilize with lightning speed to “defend sovereignty” halfway around the world, but drag our feet for decades when it comes to basic voting rights, housing, and healthcare for black and brown citizens at home?
You see the pattern. Empathy becomes highly selective when filtered through the lens of power and profit.
And then there is the matter of religion. Oh, they are invoking God every night on the news. Prayer breakfasts, chaplains blessing bombs, language of “just war” thrown around like confetti.
As a Christian myself, as someone deeply rooted in the Black Church tradition, I must say: God is not a mascot for empire.
You cannot put a cross on a cruise missile and call it righteous.
You cannot baptize a policy in moral rhetoric and expect it to emerge clean.
The same Jesus who blessed the poor, who called peacemakers the children of God, who warned that those who live by the sword will die by the sword—that Jesus does not suddenly become the chaplain of the Pentagon because the polls look good and the flags are waving.
So we must reclaim the prophetic dimension of faith—not as a weapon to justify war, but as a critique of idolatry, of violence, of the worship of nation and market and military might.
Now I know some of you in this room may be wrestling. Maybe your cousin is deployed. Maybe your brother put on that uniform because the factory closed and the military recruiter was the only one offering a paycheck and a promise of college money. Maybe you’re torn between love for them and disgust at the policies that put them in harm’s way.
That tension is real. Do not run from it. Let it deepen your compassion, not harden your heart.
You can oppose the war precisely because you love those who serve.
You can say to them: “I honor your courage, I honor your sacrifice—but I refuse to let your blood be used as currency in a cruel game of geopolitical poker.”
And what of the Iraqi people? We’ve been fed an image of them as faceless masses behind an evil dictator, as if their entire existence can be reduced to a caricature of their ruler.
But somewhere in Baghdad tonight there is a mother holding a child, listening for the sirens. Somewhere in Basra a young man is writing in his journal, wondering if he will live to see the end of the week. Somewhere in Mosul an old man is remembering earlier wars, earlier promises, earlier betrayals.
They do not all love Saddam. Many fear him, resist him, resent him. But they have no control over the machinery of state. And when our bombs fall, they fall on them.
So we must refuse this flattening, this dehumanization. To say “No” to this war is to say “Yes” to the full humanity of Iraqis, Kuwaitis, Palestinians, Israelis, Americans—every single one bearing the image of the divine.
Now my young brothers and sisters, let me talk directly to you as students.
This university—like so many across this nation—has too often trained brilliant minds to manage the machinery of injustice more efficiently. It has turned out experts who can design more sophisticated weapons, more complex financial instruments, more clever propaganda, all while calling it “excellence” and “professionalism.”
You are here in this sit-in declaring: We will not be polished cogs in a deadly machine.
You are saying, “We will not simply be success stories in a failing civilization.”
You are insisting that your education must be more than credentialization for elites; it must be a formation of conscience, a preparation for struggle, a cultivation of what I like to call spiritual and moral excellence.
What good is it to graduate summa cum laude from Harvard, Princeton, or any other mighty institution if you emerge ethically illiterate, politically clueless, spiritually empty?
We need graduates who are willing to be maladjusted to injustice, maladjusted to racism, maladjusted to militarism, maladjusted to a media that turns war into entertainment and suffering into spectacle.
This sit-in is a school of a different kind.
Right here in this atrium, on this cold floor, with your posters and petitions and late-night debates, you are learning lessons no textbook can teach:
How to organize across racial, gender, and class lines.
How to disagree without demonizing.
How to turn moral outrage into disciplined, strategic action.
How to sustain hope when the powers that be seem immovable.
You are learning that democracy is not a spectator sport. It is a messy, noisy, beautiful, dangerous practice. It is people like you choosing to put your bodies on the line, to risk arrest, to risk ridicule, to say, “We are more than consumers. We are citizens. We are moral agents.”
(Applause; drum of hands on the floor.)
Now let me say a word about hope, because in times like these, hope can be in short supply.
Hope is not optimism. Optimism says, “It’s all going to work out.” Optimism needs good evidence, good polls, good news. When things go badly, optimism collapses.
Hope says, “Even if it does not work out, even if the powers remain powerful, even if the war machine rolls on, we will still stand up, we will still bear witness, we will still love, we will still fight for justice, because it is right.”
Hope is a discipline. It is a habit. It is a style of life.
And make no mistake—this sit-in is an embodiment of hope. You are not here because you are guaranteed victory. You are here because you refuse to surrender your souls to apathy and cynicism.
You are here because you know there is something worse than losing a political struggle—and that is losing your capacity to feel, to care, to be moved by the suffering of others.
So what do we do?
Some of you may be thinking, “Professor West, I agree with you, I’m against this war—but what difference can a few hundred students on a campus really make?”
Let me tell you: empires do not crumble overnight, and they do not tremble because of a single march or a single sit-in. But they do take note when the children of privilege refuse to be co-opted, when the next generation refuses to swallow the myths.
You can:
Organize teach-ins that deconstruct the propaganda.
Pressure this university to divest from companies profiting from war.
Flood your representatives with letters, faxes, calls—make it politically costly for them to cheerlead this war.
Link up with veterans’ groups, with peace organizations, with churches, mosques, and synagogues committed to nonviolence.
Refuse the easy path of careerism that says, “Get yours and don’t worry about the bodies beneath the banquet table.”
But even deeper than that, you can cultivate in yourselves the kind of character that will resist the seduction of comfort when you leave this campus.
Because the real test is not just what you do during the war, when the cameras are watching; it is what you will do after, when the flags come down, the headlines move on, and the same structures of injustice keep grinding away.
Let me be very concrete: The Gulf War will end. There will be a ceasefire, parades, speeches about victory. The dead—ours and theirs—will not rise. The wounded will not be magically healed. The environmental devastation, the psychological trauma, the geopolitical blowback—these will haunt us for years, for decades.
And the same voices that rushed us into war will tell you, “Don’t look back. Don’t dwell on it. It’s time to move on.”
But you must remember. You must refuse amnesia.
You must say, “No, we will not forget the faces of the Iraqi children, the American soldiers, the mothers on both sides. We will not forget the lies that were told, the questions that were silenced, the profits that were made.”
Your memory can be an act of resistance.
I stand before you tonight not as some detached academic, but as a fellow struggler, a flawed human being trying to make sense of a cruel and beautiful world.
I get tired. I get angry. I get discouraged.
But when I see you here—black, white, Asian, Latino, Native, Arab; Christian, Muslim, Jewish, agnostic; queer, straight; rich, poor, in-between—when I see you sitting in together, singing together, arguing and laughing and planning together, I feel a deep, deep gratitude.
Because this is what democracy looks like at its best.
This is what a beloved community might look like in embryo—a place where we take each other seriously, where we refuse to let the bombs falling thousands of miles away sever the bonds that tie us to the human family.
I want to leave you with this image.
Somewhere in the Gulf tonight, a young soldier—maybe from Detroit, or the Bronx, or a small town in Texas—is staring up at the same moon that hangs above this campus. He is wondering if he will live to see his mother again. He is wondering if anyone back home really understands what is happening.
Somewhere else, an Iraqi child is peeking out from a basement window, listening for sirens, clutching a doll. She is wondering if the grown-ups of this world have lost their minds, if the explosions will ever stop.
Between that soldier and that child stretches an ocean of propaganda, fear, prejudice, and power.
But between them and you, right here, stretches something else: the possibility of solidarity. The possibility that you will refuse to see them as enemies, refuse to let your minds be colonized by the logic of war, refuse to accept that this is the best we can do.
So I ask you, my dear brothers and sisters:
Will you be spectators—or participants?
Will you be careerists—or truth-seekers?
Will you be lovers of comfort—or lovers of justice?
(A low chorus of “Justice!” from the crowd.)
Will you allow your education to make you more skillful servants of empire—or courageous critics of empire?
(Applause swells.)
If your answer is the latter—and I believe it is, because you are here, because you are already risking comfort, already standing out—then know this:
You may not stop this war by yourselves.
But you will keep alive a tradition of resistance that stretches from abolitionists who defied slavery, to workers who built unions, to suffragists who demanded the vote, to civil rights marchers who faced dogs and water hoses, to antiwar activists who refused to bless mass murder with polite silence.
You are part of that line now.
So stay in this struggle. Argue with each other, yes, but don’t give up on each other. Study hard, not to escape the world, but to understand it more deeply and change it more wisely. Love fiercely, because love is the only force strong enough to break the cycle of violence and revenge.
And when they tell you that opposing this war is unpatriotic, you tell them: No. The highest form of patriotism is to hold your nation accountable to its own professed ideals.
The flag is not a blindfold. It is not a gag. It should never be used to cover up the bodies of the innocent.
Let your conscience be your compass, not the polls, not the ratings, not the noise of the talking heads.
I thank you for your courage. I thank you for your witness. I thank you for allowing an old brother like me to share a few words in the midst of your beautiful, righteous disruption.
May you be dangerous to lies, gentle with each other, and steadfast in the struggle for justice.
And may we together—across races, across religions, across borders—build a world where war is not the default language of diplomacy, where the Gulf, and every sea, no longer mirrors the fire of bombs but the light of human dignity.
I love you. I respect you. I’m with you.
Keep the faith. Keep thinking. Keep fighting.
(Thunderous applause. Some stand, some chant “No more war!” Others wipe their eyes. Outside, the winter night presses against the glass, but inside, for a moment, the room feels warmer.)